The US Presidency Has Been Frozen on One Generation Since 1993

The US Presidency Has Been Frozen on One Generation Since 1993

Plot every US president by birth year against the year they took office and you should get a staircase that keeps climbing. For two centuries it does. After 1993, it goes flat.

1856–61 born / 1901–21 in office 1882–87 / 1933–53 1908–13 / 1963–89 1942–47 / 1993–2029
Step chart of US presidential birth year vs calendar year, with cluster bands and a four-segment piecewise linear fit.

The piecewise linear fit (with breakpoints chosen by minimizing residual error) carves the data into four eras:

  • 1789–1901, slope 1.09. Brisk generational turnover. Each calendar year nudges the incumbent's birth year by slightly more than a year.
  • 1901–1961, slope 0.69. Progressive era through Eisenhower. Real drag, partly from FDR's twelve years but broader than him alone.
  • 1961–1993, slope 0.29. Post-Eisenhower stagnation. The 1908–1913 cohort (LBJ, Nixon, Ford, Reagan) holds the office for most of three decades, with detours through Carter and GHW Bush.
  • 1993–2029, slope 0.01. Flat. Clinton, GW Bush, Trump, Biden, and Trump again were all born between 1942 and 1946. Obama is the only break.

This started as a casual observation. Four of the last five presidents have been born within five years of each other. That seemed tight, so I went looking for similar clusters earlier in the data. They exist. The 1908–1913 cohort (LBJ through Reagan) is one. The 1882–1887 cohort (FDR and Truman) is another. None of them are individually unusual.

What's unusual is how long this current cluster has lasted. A permutation test (shuffling presidents' birth years across their inauguration positions and checking how often a five-year cohort holds 78% of the office-time across a 36-year window) puts the odds at about 1 in 500. The 1993 to 2029 lockout is a real outlier, not just a recency illusion.

Each successive era after 1901 runs at roughly half the slope of the previous one (0.69 to 0.29 to 0.01). I'm not going to pretend I have a clean causal story for that. Incumbency advantage, longer lifespans, the Boomer demographic bulge pinning the office, the rising age of first-time presidential candidates, plain small-sample noise. Probably some of all of those. The shape is the part I keep coming back to. Whatever's driving it, the trend over the last hundred and twenty years is a staircase down, and the bottom step is currently flat.

A ceiling at 65 that held for two centuries

The same data, transformed differently, surfaces something else. If you chart the age of the sitting president instead of their birth year, you get a sawtooth. The line rises at one year per calendar year within each term, then jumps (usually down) at each transition. The four colored corridors are the same generational cohorts from the first chart, now appearing as diagonal bands because each cohort's age range slides up the y-axis at slope one as time advances.

Age of sitting US president by year with four diagonal cohort corridors and a 65-year-old reference line.

For most of US history, the line lives in a corridor between 50 and 65. The dashed reference at 65 was effectively a ceiling. Eisenhower scraped against it and exited at 70 in 1961, but nobody stayed up there. Reagan broke through it hard in 1981 and finished at 77. At the time you could have called him a one-off, and the line did fall back through Clinton, Bush, and Obama.

It hasn't fallen back since. Trump-Biden-Trump is the first sustained stretch in US history with the line parked above 70, and the current term ends at 83. Whatever was holding the ceiling at 65 for two centuries stopped holding sometime around 2017.

The cohort lockout from the first chart shows up here as the sawtooth tracking inside the diagonal bands. When the line sits within a band, the office is held by a cohort member. When it drops out, a non-cohort president stepped in. Carter and GHW Bush dip below the pink band. Obama drops straight through the floor of the orange band before the cohort returns above him. Within the orange band specifically, Clinton entered at 46, Bush at 54, Trump at 70, Biden at 78, Trump again at 78. Five presidencies, four of them within five years of each other in birth year, taking turns aging in place. The sawtooth doesn't just stay above 70 in recent years. It tracks the upper edge of the cohort corridor itself.

Built with Chart.js. Methodology for the first chart: piecewise linear regression via dynamic programming, year-by-year occupancy of the office, breakpoints selected by minimum RSS subject to a 15-year minimum segment length. Permutation test used 200,000 shuffles. The 2029 endpoint assumes the current term runs to its scheduled end. The age chart uses calendar-year resolution; brief mid-year transitions like the W.H. Harrison-to-Tyler handoff in 1841 collapse to a single year. Cohort corridors are bounded by y = x - b_low and y = x - b_high where b_low and b_high are the cohort's birth-year span.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Political Economy Primer

Political Economy Primer Note: The PDF document currently covers Parts I through IV of the primer, which span the schools of thought, historical genealogy, political spectrum placement, and cross-school comparisons. The remaining sections are still in progress and will be posted as they're completed. I've been working on this primer for the past several months. The goal from the start was to put together something I wished had existed when I first started studying economics: a single document that takes every major school of economic thought seriously on its own terms, rather than picking a winner upfront. Whether you're already familiar with some of these traditions or coming in fresh, I hope it gives you a useful framework for evaluating the economic arguments you encounter every day. The primer covers 11 schools of thought, from Classical to modern Mainstream and Heterodox schools. It traces how these traditions developed, where they agree, where they clash, and wh...
Read more

Congress Is Aging Too, But It's Not Frozen

Congress Is Aging Too, But It's Not Frozen In my last post , I showed that the presidency has been locked on a single generation since 1993. The birth-year slope flatlined. Is Congress doing the same thing? Partially. Congress is aging, but 535 seats refresh faster than a single office. Members retire, lose primaries, die in office. The two chambers tell very different stories, though. The House has stabilized. The Senate hasn't. Median Age Over Time The House held remarkably steady from 1927 through the early 1980s, median age bobbing between 51 and 55 for over five decades. Then it dipped to a low of 49.7 in 1985 as a wave of younger members entered after the post-Watergate and Reagan-era elections. From that floor, it climbed steadily to about 59 by 2011, then plateaued. The ascent wasn't one dramatic election. It was a grinding ramp from roughly 1997 to 2007, gaining about a year of median age every two calendar years. The Senate has a wilder story. It...
Read more